Editor, Gazette-Journal:
Recent letters about Kamala Harris have shed light on her controversial “wind-sock” record, revealing a pattern of inconsistencies and questionable decisions that raise serious concerns about her suitability for the presidency. The critiques leveled at Harris in these letters are far from baseless; they highlight a troubling lack of coherence and effectiveness in her political career.
As a former San Francisco District Attorney and California Attorney General, Harris’s record is marked by several contentious stances. Her tenure as a “border czar” was notably ineffective, and her support for consumer price controls and unrealized capital gains taxes reflect a troubling approach to economic policy. She has been criticized for her flip-flopping on key issues, such as border wall construction and fracking, demonstrating a troubling inconsistency in her positions.
Harris’s endorsement of “Bidenomics” has been widely criticized as a catastrophic failure, and her invo...