Editor, Gazette-Journal:
I think it’s worth taking a look at the rulings from district court judges that have recently come out aimed at the Executive Orders and subsequent actions of the Trump administration.
There are 125 lawsuits pending to try to prevent the president from moving forward with his agenda. Chuck Schumer recently said, “We did put 235 judges, progressive judges, judges not under the control of Trump, last year on the bench, and they are ruling against Trump time after time after time.”
Chuck is telling us this was premeditated and planned in the event a progressive didn’t get elected president, not organic. It is easy to see this is true. And DOGE discovered that almost all of these judges have family members on the payrolls of NGOs that are directly and favorably impacted by their rulings.
As a rule, a district court judge can intervene if a president’s policy is found to overstep statutory limits or infringe on protected rights in a specific instance, but they have ...
To view the rest of this article, you must log in. If you do not have an account with us, please subscribe here.